If you are referring to groups or general names, you should pay attention to the number and conformity between the sexes. • Words related to a subject by being related to, in addition to, with, as well as (as), with, in addition, not, etc., are in parentheses and the verb corresponds to the original subject.  For example, in Standard English, we can say that I am or that he is, but not “I am” or “he is”. This is because the grammar of language requires that the verb and its subject correspond personally. The pronouns I and him are the first or third person respectively, just as the verb forms are and are. The verb must be chosen in such a way as to have the same person as the subject, unlike the fictitious agreement based on meaning.   For example, in American English, the un expression is treated as a singular for the purposes of the agreement, although it is formally plural. Here he agrees with Caesar, not with the enemies: it is singular and not plural (which would be them). Here too, there is another type of agreement: she tells us that Caesar was a man, not a woman – a female subject like Cleopatra would of course be synonymous with her, and a man who is not alive like the state would need it. This “gender equality” is only necessary if the name with which one agrees is singular and not the spokesperson or the recipient.
Elsewhere, it`s lost — there`s no sexual information in me, ours, theirs, or the other. In Hungarian, verbs are polypersonal, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only with its subject, but also with its (precise) object. There is a distinction between the case where there is a particular object and the case where the object is indeterminate or where there is no object at all. (Adverbians have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I like someone or something unspecified), more (I love him, she, she or she, in particular), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, us, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, him or her specifically). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is a correspondence between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often relates more or less precisely to the person). • If the subjects are related by or by, nor, etc., the verb corresponds to the close subject. (Proximity rule)  “numbering agreement.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Webster merriam, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/number%20agreement.
Called November 27, 2020. Articles, possessives and other determinants also decrease for number and (only in the singular) for sex, with plural determinants being the same for both sexes. This usually leads to three forms: one for masculine singular nouns, the other for feminine singular nouns, and the other for plural nouns of both sexes: • A question with whom or what a singular verb takes. In the case of verbs, gender conformity is less prevalent, although it may still occur. For example, in the past French compound, in certain circumstances, the past part corresponds to the subject or an object (see past compound for details). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. The number is probably the most common cause of pronoun compliance errors (see 28. Pronoun errors, #5) followed by sex. The problem with it is frequent again. At the beginning of English, there was concordance for the second person singular of all verbs in the present tense, as well as in the past of some common verbs.
It was normally in the form -est, but -st and -t also occurred.. . .